Apr

6

Cheers to the American Consumer

By admin

Harvard Business School professor John Quelch wrote an interesting article recently. I like the Harvard Business School, but must admit I was disappointed by this piece. I expect more from Harvard Professors... John Quelch... Why is the American consumer more venturesome? Six factors come to mind? Wealth. The average American consumer has more disposable income than his or her counterparts in most other countries. There is therefore money available, with easy credit historically fueling the fire, to risk on new things and new experiences. And the secondary market, from the flea auction to eBay, is well developed so the consumer does not necessarily lose everything if disappointed. This may be changing in the current economic crisis - time will tell, but a reasonable proposition. Mobility. American consumers relocate more than most. What they own, how they dress, what they do. In other words, their consumption behavior becomes an important signaling device to attract efficiently the right set of new friends and acquaintances. It's not so much a matter of keeping up with the Joneses; it's a matter of quickly identifying the Joneses like you. This is one of the key reasons that marketing to customer demographics is so successful in America. This mobility does not make you more venturesome. It seems that these mobile people are homesick and as the Professor describes, seek out people "just like them". Not a particularly venturesome trait. Immigration. The prevalence of immigrants among America's successful entrepreneurs is well documented. But the same curiosity and openness to new things also characterizes consumer demand in the American melting pot. Maybe, but by and large, the American consumer is relatively conservative compared to Eheir European or Asian counterparts. Independence. The American frontier tradition and the sheer number of Americans promotes an attention to individual differentiation that is less prevalent in more conformist and homogeneous societies. Among 300 million curious consumers, it is possible for almost any innovation to find a viable niche market. Agree - large numbers make a wide range of weird and unusual niche's viable. Recognition. Americans are not overly concerned or burdened by history. Many live for today or for the next new thing. Early adopters and lead users of new products are listened to and applauded. Their opinions are sought on the Internet. They can accelerate adoption of a new product or kill it. The American maverick commands more influence than the European eccentric. Not sure I agree when you compare mavericks to eccentrics professor. Maverick - someone who exhibits great independence in thought and action. Eccentric - a person with an unusual or odd personality. Technology. Americans understand that innovation is the key to growth and wealth in a global economy where knowledge travels at lightspeed over the Internet. America's economic strength is based on innovation. Proud parents take their children to science fairs, new electronic gizmos dominate Christmas gift sales, and senior citizens find renewed connectivity with far-flung families by going online. Americans know technology adds value to daily life. America is way behind countries like Japan, Australia Singapore and Hong Kong when it comes to telecommunications devices and infrastructure. The internet bandwidth in the US is the standout (the rest of US telecommunications is a mess) - this is driving the new wave of entrepreneurship and consumer spending. These traits apply equally to consumers and entrepreneurs. They are of course the same people. Consumers can become problem-solving entrepreneurs and successful entrepreneurs such as Bill Gates and Michael Dell become well-respected role models for younger people. Marketing, a distinctly American expertise, has of course encouraged consumers to be venturesome and to welcome innovation. Marketers research customer needs, design new products to solve customer problems, and motivate purchase through attractive pricing and heavy advertising, with the occasional dose of built-in obsolescence. An example is Intel's remarkably effective pull advertising campaign that had consumers clamoring to OEMs for PCs with the latest, fastest microprocessor. Why are their sales down 25% compared to last year? Politicians, like marketers, understand the importance of the venturesome consumer. President Obama's campaign slogan, "Change we can believe in," captures perfectly the spirit of the venturesome American consumer, looking forward, ever-hopeful, and prepared to take a chance on something new. Please professor, more research please - particularly if you want to post articles with a global perspective.

Apr

3

How Much Obsolescence Can Business and Society Absorb?

By admin

Published:April 3, 2009
Author:Jim Heskett

The other night a classmate and long-time friend, at the end of a phone conversation, said, "I'll email you with the directions to our place." Then he paused and said, "That sounds pretty old-fashioned, doesn't it?" It's possible that, along with me, he is beginning to feel out of date. The irony is that he is the retired CEO of one of the largest companies fostering the networking revolution.

The facts are undeniable. Watch an old movie in which people remove the telephone receiver from the wall, type (either manually or electronically), and even begin to email (as in "You've Got Mail!"). It's always good for a laugh. Then you remember that, as I did, you only scrapped your manual typewriter 17 years ago, put away the carbon paper in favor of the "cc" line on email only 12 years ago, and began watching video on your computer just a few years ago. Now there is a growing sense that the desktops and laptops of the past are giving way to netbooks that are a highly-portable cross between the iPhone and the old laptop.

Language has been condensed with the size of tech devices and the continued clumsiness of our thumbs. Along with it, some fear that there is a growing inability or unwillingness of readers or listeners to sustain an attention span of more than a few lines or a couple of minutes. As a result, entire industries, such as newspaper publishing, are dying along with a generation that buys and reads them. People are reading news online, but they are willing to pay very little for it. As a result, in-depth investigative reporting (by pros, not those often sharing their ignorance on blog sites) that is revealing many aspects of the current economic bust—including fraud and questionable management decisions—is dying as well. Along with this there is a gnawing sense that investigative reporting will not even be missed by the coming generations of tech-savvy citizens and managers.

What of the impact on investors and the financial community? Columnist David Brooks has suggested that new technologies actually fostered lightning-fast investment decisions in the recent economic meltdown, but contributed to a herd-like mentality that exaggerated swings in attitudes and markets.

How are new technologies affecting organizations? Are "tech cliques" forming around such media as Facebook, YouTube, and now Twitter? How does that affect the transfer of information that used to take place around the water cooler? And what about those of us with management responsibilities who feel that we are losing the communications race and missing out on a growing part of the "action" in our organizations? In the past, given the snail's pace of tech change, we could wait out the next generation of managers and their technologies until we retired. That may no longer be possible. What are you doing, as hockey great Wayne Gretzky is quoted as saying, to "skate to where the puck is going to be"?

What rate of change in communications technology can the organization absorb? What do you think?

To read more:

David Brooks, "Greed and Stupidity," The New York Times, April 3, 2009, p. A23.